Understanding Oregon’s Comparative Negligence Law and Its Impact on Your Personal Injury Case

Share This Post

If you’ve been injured in an accident in Oregon, you may be wondering how fault is determined and what it means for your ability to recover compensation. Oregon’s comparative negligence law (also known as contributory negligence law) plays a crucial role in personal injury cases, particularly when multiple parties share responsibility for an accident. This article will help you understand what comparative negligence means, how it works, and how it might impact your claim.

What Is Comparative Negligence?

Comparative negligence is a legal principle used to allocate fault among all parties involved in an accident. Under this system, each party’s degree of fault is measured as a percentage, and any compensation awarded is adjusted accordingly. Oregon follows a modified comparative negligence rule, which has specific implications for personal injury claims.

Oregon’s Modified Comparative Negligence Rule

In Oregon, you can recover compensation for your injuries as long as your share of fault does not exceed 50%. If you are found to be anything over 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages. This is known as the “50% bar rule.”

For example:

· If you are determined to be 30% at fault for a car accident and the total damages amount to $100,000, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. In this case, you would receive $70,000.

· However, if you are found to be 51% at fault, you would not be eligible to recover any compensation.

How Fault Is Determined

Fault is determined by examining the actions of all parties involved in the accident. This process typically involves:

· Police Reports: These can provide critical evidence, such as witness statements, scene sketches or photos, statements of the parties involved and property damage evidence.

· Eyewitness Testimonies: Statements from people who saw the accident can help clarify what happened.

· Scene Analysis: Often, an examination of the scene can provide useful information or clues regarding liability. This can include lanes of travel, curves, debris, vegetation, tire markings, speed and other road signs

· Expert Analysis: Accident reconstruction experts can analyze evidence like skid marks, vehicle damage, and road conditions to determine fault.

· Your Actions: Any behavior that may have contributed to the accident, such as speeding or distracted driving, will be considered. Also, intoxication can be a factor. (For more detail about pursuing an intoxication claim, see our article about dram shop claims in Oregon.

Why Comparative Negligence Matters

Understanding Oregon’s comparative negligence law is crucial because insurance companies often use it to minimize reasonable compensation. For instance, they might argue that you share more of the liability than you actually do, thereby reducing, or worse, refusing altogether the amount they owe you. This makes it essential to have strong legal representation to advocate for your interests and ensure liability is accurately assessed.

Common Scenarios Involving Comparative Negligence

Here are a few examples of how comparative negligence might come into play:

1. Car Accidents: If you were rear-ended but your brake lights weren’t functioning properly, you might be assessed partial fault.

2. Slip-and-Fall Accidents: If you slipped on a wet floor but were distracted by your phone, you might share responsibility for the incident.

3. Bicycle Accidents: If a car hit you while you were riding against traffic, you might be found partially at fault.

Protecting Your Right to Compensation

If you’re pursuing a personal injury claim, here are some steps you can take to protect your rights:

· Gather Evidence: Take photos, collect witness information, and document your injuries.

· Seek Medical Attention: Prompt treatment not only ensures your well-being but also provides documentation of your injuries.

· Avoid Admitting Fault: Even casual statements like “I’m sorry” can be used against you.

· Consult an Attorney: An experienced personal injury lawyer can help you navigate the complexities of Oregon’s comparative negligence law and build a strong case. · Want more – see our Will I Get A Settlement for My Injuries article for a more detailed review of this topic.

Conclusion

Oregon’s modified comparative negligence rule allows injured parties to seek compensation even if they share some fault for an accident. However, understanding how fault is determined and its impact on your claim is essential for maximizing your recovery. If you’ve been injured in an accident, contact our experienced personal injury attorneys for a free consultation. We’ll fight to ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve.

Call us today to discuss your case and learn how we can help you navigate Oregon’s comparative negligence law!

Related Posts

Winter Workplace Injuries

Workers’ compensation insurance is essential for employees who sustain injuries while performing job-related tasks. It ensures workers receive the financial assistance, recovery time, and job

Looking for Something? Search in the box below!

Search
Free case
Evaluation
Shlesinger & deVilleneuve Attorneys, P.C.
Our Reviews